No, you can't leave early.
Billy and A-squared did a good job of both analyzing and describing the painting on how they felt about it, definitely good work.
macabre and Strawberry twix both have good descriptions, observations, and inferences. I think Swarm is Hill's paper.
Macabre did an awesome job at using amazing vocabulary and a very good analysis of the painting on a macrocosm scale and microcosm scale.
(This is my Fake Name)BillyI think yours is the one called Scott Hill...
I think Joe is the man and A-squared did a good job in describing what they thought the painting meant, and gave good details.
KG and Brown Sugar. The two most impressive are macabre and the swarm. We believe the swarm is Mr Hills essay.
I vote for Macabre and White Chocolate and Mr. Hill's essay is Team Angry Birds
Team Angry birds did an awesome job describing the painting and analyzed the painting well.. Good Job Mr. Hill
This comment has been removed by the author.
I really like (this is my fake name) .. I love the wording and think that they depicted the painting very well.
A squared and Joe is the man both have good , ovbservations, analyzations, and infrences. I like the name Joe is the man. I think Mr. Hill is Ballers.
I think that A-squared and (this is my fake name) had good observations and inferences. They both did good in describing the painting, with words that expresses it well.
I think Team Angry Birds is Mr. Hill. They know too much about the painting to have not seen it before
I think that Team Angry Birds is mister Hills and (this is my fake name) is really good.
I nominate A Squared and White Chocolate. Both of these make some good inferences and touch on the thematic content of the painting.Hill probably wrote as Team Angry Birds.
I am voting for the essays of the teams Macbre and White Chocolate.Mr. Hill's essay is Team Angry Birds
Billy and A-squared did a good job of both analyzing and describing the painting on how they felt about it, definitely good work.
ReplyDeletemacabre and Strawberry twix both have good descriptions, observations, and inferences. I think Swarm is Hill's paper.
ReplyDeleteMacabre did an awesome job at using amazing vocabulary and a very good analysis of the painting on a macrocosm scale and microcosm scale.
ReplyDelete(This is my Fake Name)
ReplyDeleteBilly
I think yours is the one called Scott Hill...
I think Joe is the man and A-squared did a good job in describing what they thought the painting meant, and gave good details.
ReplyDeleteKG and Brown Sugar. The two most impressive are macabre and the swarm.
ReplyDeleteWe believe the swarm is Mr Hills essay.
I vote for Macabre and White Chocolate and Mr. Hill's essay is Team Angry Birds
ReplyDeleteTeam Angry birds did an awesome job describing the painting and analyzed the painting well.. Good Job Mr. Hill
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI really like (this is my fake name) .. I love the wording and think that they depicted the painting very well.
ReplyDeleteA squared and Joe is the man both have good , ovbservations, analyzations, and infrences. I like the name Joe is the man.
ReplyDeleteI think Mr. Hill is Ballers.
I think that A-squared and (this is my fake name) had good observations and inferences. They both did good in describing the painting, with words that expresses it well.
ReplyDeleteI think Team Angry Birds is Mr. Hill. They know too much about the painting to have not seen it before
ReplyDeleteI think that Team Angry Birds is mister Hills and (this is my fake name) is really good.
ReplyDeleteI nominate A Squared and White Chocolate. Both of these make some good inferences and touch on the thematic content of the painting.
ReplyDeleteHill probably wrote as Team Angry Birds.
I am voting for the essays of the teams Macbre and White Chocolate.
ReplyDeleteMr. Hill's essay is Team Angry Birds